Select City

Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic


Samsung recently introduced the Samsung S24 series of smartphones and these are being powered by Exynos 2400 chipset. And the other rival in the similar segment is Apple’s A16 Bionic chipset, which is a 2-year-old chipset. Here is a detailed comparison between the Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic.

- Updated: 7th Feb 2024, 16:34 IST
  • 1
    Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: Overview
    • Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: CPU
    • Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: GPU
    • Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: Connectivity
    • Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: Multimedia (ISP)

Samsung recently announced its new processor Exynos 2400 with the debut of the Galaxy S24 series, two years after the Exynos 2200, its predecessor, was released into the market. On the other hand, Apple introduced A16 bionic chip two years ago with the iPhone 14 Pro and 14 Pro Max. The A16 is a relatively minor evolution but there are a few changes to be sure, but the average user is unlikely to notice them.

The comparison between the Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic is a comparison between a 2024 chipset with a 2-year-old chipset. The comparison between Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic sheds light on their performance, capabilities, and the impact they are set to make in the mobile technology landscape.

Also Read: Samsung Galaxy S24 vs iPhone 15 Pro Max

Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: Overview

Both the Exynos 2400 and Apple A16 Bionic are top-tier processors and these chipsets are renowned for their excellent performance, energy efficiency, and advanced technological features. Here’s an overview of the specifications of both CPUs:

Exynos 2400Apple A16 Bionic
CPU10-core CPU6-core, Kryo CPU
CPU Cores1x 3.2GHz (Cortex-X4)
2x 2.9GHz (Cortex-A720)
3x 2.6GHz (Cortex-A720)
4x 2.0GHz (Cortex-A520)
2x 3.36GHz (Everest)
4x 2.02GHz (Sawtooth)
Process TechnologySamsung’s 4nm LPP+TSMC’s 4nm process
GPUXclipse 940 GPU based on AMD RDNA 3 architecture, 6-coreApple GPU
GPU Frequency1009 MHz1398 MHz
Camera CapabilityUp to 320MP in single-camera mode
Dual-camera 64MP+32MP at 30FPS
Up to 200MP in single camera mode
Dual-camera 64MP+36MP at 30FPS
8K @ 60FPS HDR, HDR10+, and HLG4K @ 60FPSHLG, Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+
Modem5G modem up to 12.1Gbps Peak Download up to 3.67Gbps Peak UploadIn-house 5G modem up to 7.5Gbps Peak Downloadup to 3.5Gbps Peak Upload
Wi-Fi SupportWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4, LE AudioBluetooth 5.3, LE Audio, Dual Bluetooth Antenna, aptX Lossless
OthersAV1 Codec SupportAV1 Codec SupportNavIC SupportSnapdragon Seamless

Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: CPU

Samsung Semiconductor produced the Exynos 2400 based on the enhanced 4nm LPP+ process technology and this fabrication method has now caught up to TSMC’s 4nm process node. This is the third iteration of Samsung’s 4nm process node.

This time, Samsung has chosen to use a deca-core CPU and the Exynos 2400 features 10 CPU cores. With one Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.2GHz, two Cortex-A720 cores clocked at 2.90GHz, three Cortex-A720 cores clocked slightly below at 2.60GHz, and four Cortex-A520 tiny cores clocked at 2.0GHz, the Exynos 2400 CPU features a tri-cluster architecture.

Most CPU benchmarks should show performance benefits of 10% or less, since the CPU design hasn’t changed significantly and it only runs at a clock speed up to 7% higher (and with additional memory bandwidth available).

It is evident from a cursory glance at the Geekbench 5 data that the highest single-core CPU performance for A16 Bionic has increased compared to the A15 by about 8–10%. Performance on many cores is marginally better, but those tests probably have an easier time filling the chip’s caches, so they stand to gain from the extra memory bandwidth.

Benchmark Results:

Exynos 2400Apple A16 Bionic
Antutu 1016,47,36914,34,432
GeekBench 6 Single Core21892614
GeekBench 6 Multi Core69556795

Also Read: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: GPU

Samsung claims that the Exynos 2400’s Xclipse 940 GPU is the chipset’s best feature. It features six GPU cores and is built on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture. It offers hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability, similar to that of the SD 8 Gen 3’s Adreno 750 GPU.

With lights, reflections, and shadows added for a vibrant gaming experience, HW-accelerated ray tracing can enhance the immersion of video games even further.

According to Samsung, the Xclipse 940 GPU is a significant advance over the Xclipse 920 GPU, being 70% quicker. Furthermore, the GPU can support 4K displays at 120Hz and QHD+ screens at 144Hz.

The A16 Bionic features five GPU cores, and I don’t think the architecture has changed. However, advanced 3D graphics often have substantial demands on memory bandwidth, therefore I anticipate that the move to LPDDR5 memory will have a big influence here. It would make sense to assume that the cores could run about 7% faster, similar to what the high-performance CPU cores can.

Examining 3DMark Wild Life, one of the most demanding 3D graphics benchmarks, performance varies from approximately 7% faster on easier modes to approximately 19% faster in the “Wild Life Extreme Unlimited” test. That’s a nice improvement and consistent with what I would anticipate with a significant increase in RAM bandwidth and a slight rise in clock speed.

Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: Connectivity

Unexpectedly, Samsung’s Exynos 2400 chipset includes a functional 5G modem. Using mmWave 5G bands, this modem can provide download speeds of up to 9.6 Gbps and upload speeds of up to 3.67 Gbps. The Exynos 2400 offers support for Bluetooth 5.4, Wi-Fi 7, and AV1 codec in addition to 5G connection.

In contrast, the Apple A16 Bionic is equipped with Apple’s in-house modem, which can deliver up to 7.5 Gbps of peak download speed and 3.5 Gbps of upload speed. Support for Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi 6 and AV1 encoding and decoding are also included.

Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic: Multimedia (ISP)

Based on the comparison between Samsung Exynos 2400 and Apple A16 Bionic, both processors demonstrate powerful image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. However, it’s important to note that detailed performance assessments are crucial in evaluating specific differences in ISP functionality, such as colour accuracy, noise reduction, dynamic range enhancement, and low-light performance.

The Exynos 2400 and A16 Bionic exhibit strong ISP performance, showcasing their prowess in enhancing image quality. Additionally, benchmark comparisons and tests reveal that the Exynos 2400 is reportedly 30% faster than the Apple A16 Bionic, indicating noteworthy processing capabilities for image signal processing tasks.

Moreover, the comparison emphasizes the significance of the ISP component within these processors, highlighting their ability to handle advanced camera systems and deliver high-quality image processing.

Ultimately, the choice between the Exynos 2400 and the Apple A16 Bionic will likely come down to personal preference. Both chipsets offer robust performance, excellent graphics, and efficient power use, making them excellent choices for any smartphone user. Regardless of which chipset powers your device, you’re in for a top-tier smartphone experience.

Also Read: Exynos 1330 Vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Thinking of buying a refurbished device? Cashify is the best place in India to Buy Refurbished Mobile Phones! Trust Cashify to make a smart choice today and save money!


Featured Videos

6 Interesting Things About The Apple Watch Ultra 2!
11th Sep 2023
iPhone 15 Wonderlust Launch Event: What To Expect And How To Watch?
11th Sep 2023
Apple Watch Series 9: Here Is All That Happened In The Wonderlust Event
10th Aug 2023
Samsung Games Portal: Everything You Need to Know
12th Jul 2023
Here’s The Best Way To Buy Refurbished Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Now!
11th Jul 2023

Highlights of the Story

  • Samsung’s latest flagship smartphone lineup i.e. Samsung S24 series is powered by Exynos 2400 chipset.
  • On the other hand, Apple A16 bionic is a 2-year-old processor.
  • Here is the Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic comparison.

New Launches

Motorola Moto G04

Motorola Moto G04

Starting from:
Itel P55

Itel P55

Starting from: